Estate Planning as a Career

Estate – To Trust Or Not To Trust That Is The Question!

July 16th, 2007 Filed under: ab trust,Executor Fees,sample wills,Trusts attorney — Estate Planning Author

Living Trusts have become very popular and are being heavily promoted to seniors. Should you Trust or not Trust? That is the question. Read on to learn some simple guidelines that will help you know whether a Living Trust may be right for you and how to go about getting one if needed.

A Living Trust is considered a separate legal entity much like a corporation. As a result, any assets owned by the Trust at your death avoid Probate and can pass to your heirs simply and easily. It also provides for the management of your assets if you become incapacitated.

Living Trusts can be complex documents that allow you to precisely detail your wishes or they can be a straightforward means of handling your estate. Even though the Trust is considered a separate legal entity, you retain complete control over everything you own. In fact, a Living Trust can allow you to control assets from the grave.

A Living Trust will not protect your assets from lawsuits or creditors. It wont hide your assets from Medicaid should you need to go into a nursing home. It wont automatically eliminate all estate taxes, though it can help eliminate some and reduce others. And a Living Trust only controls those assets that are owned by it, so unless you re-title your home in the name of the Trust, for instance, the Trust will not protect it from having to go through Probate.

Living Trusts are being heavily promoted through seminars. If you attend one, you may come away feeling that everyone needs a Trust. Thats not true. Although many people will benefit from one, they are not for everyone.

Take Lily, an 82-year old widow from LeHigh Acres, Florida who recently called me. She was being pressured to get a Trust after attending one of these seminars. If you dont get one, you will have to pay thousands of dollars in taxes when you die, the salesperson told her. That is completely untrue. In fact Lily didnt need a Trust at all.

Lilys assets consisted of a few small bank accounts, an IRA at a brokerage firm and a modestly priced condominium. She had already named beneficiaries on her bank accounts and IRA, so these assets would avoid Probate when they passed to her heirs. The only asset that would be subject to Probate was her condo.

Lily has a good relationship with her kids, so she can title the condo in their names. Sometimes there can be a gift-tax issue when transferring ownership of an asset to a child. I almost never recommend adding a childs name to your home, but in this case it makes sense and she shouldnt incur any tax liability.

Another option for Lily was to set up a Living Trust on her own. There are a number of off-the-shelf computer programs that provide all sorts of legal documents, such as wills, powers of attorney, contracts, and Living Trusts. Trusts created using this software may not have all the special features of those costing $2,000, but most people dont need them anyway.

Anne and her husband in South Carolina set up a Living Trust this way. They used an inexpensive software program to put together their Trust. Its critical that you have an attorney review it when youre finished. Their local attorney reviewed it, made sure everything was as it should be and only charged them $100.

If you are able to do this, then there isnt any reason not to have a Living Trust. Even if it is to handle the transfer of your real estate at death, the time you take now will make things much easier for the loved ones you leave behind.

There are, however, several situations where it pays to go ahead and have a professional draw up a Trust for you. These include your estate being worth more than $1.5 million, having children that are handicapped or disabled, or having children from a previous marriage. Professional help should be sought if you want to have incentives to financially motivate your heirs or if you want them to receive their inheritance over time instead of all at once.